United States v. Shovlin

314 F.2d 51, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 6092
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedFebruary 19, 1963
Docket14182_1
StatusPublished

This text of 314 F.2d 51 (United States v. Shovlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Shovlin, 314 F.2d 51, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 6092 (3d Cir. 1963).

Opinion

314 F.2d 51

UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Albert SPADER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
John P. SHOVLIN, M. D., Superintendent, Farview State Hospital, Waymart, Pa., and George K. Henshaw, Interstate Supervisor, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 14182.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Submitted February 5, 1963.

Decided February 19, 1963.

Albert Spader pro se.

David B. Fitzgerald, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harrisburg, Pa. (Edgar R. Casper, Deputy Atty. Gen., David Stahl, Atty. Gen., Harrisburg, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.

Before KALODNER, STALEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from the denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in which the petitioner attacks as illegal: (1) his arrest and detention by the local police of South Amboy, New Jersey; (2) his conviction in the Middlesex County Court of New Jersey upon his plea of non vult to an indictment charging the possession of obscene pictures, in violation of N.J.S.A. 2A:115-2; (3) his subsequent surrender and transfer to the Pennsylvania Board of Parole; and (4) his commitment to, and present detention in, the Farview State Hospital in Pennsylvania.

It appears from the record that upon the petitioner's conviction in the Middlesex County Court of New Jersey, the imposition of sentence was suspended and he was thereupon surrendered to the Pennsylvania Board of Parole. Thereafter he was committed to the Philadelphia State Hospital, and from there transferred to the Farview State Hospital. The district judge found, and his finding is supported by the record, that the petitioner had failed to exhaust the remedies available in the courts of the State. The denial of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus was therefore proper. 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254.

The judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States ex rel. Spader v. Shovlin
314 F.2d 51 (Third Circuit, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
314 F.2d 51, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 6092, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-shovlin-ca3-1963.