United States v. Short
73 M.J. 200, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 56
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedJanuary 16, 2014
DocketNo. 14-0040/NA
StatusPublished
This text of 73 M.J. 200 (United States v. Short) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Short, 73 M.J. 200, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 56 (Ark. 2014).
Opinion
CCA 201200483. Review granted on the following issue:
[201]*201A PUNITIVE DISCHARGE MAY NOT BE AFFIRMED WHEN THE RECORD IS NOT VERBATIM. HERE, DURING SENTENCING, THE MEMBERS HEARD SOME PORTION OF THE PROVIDENCE INQUIRY WHICH DREW A CURATIVE INSTRUCTION FROM THE MILITARY JUDGE. ON APPEAL, THE LOWER COURT ATTACHED, OVER DEFENSE OBJECTION, WHAT PURPORTED TO BE THE. MISSING SECTION. THIS SECTION WAS NOT PROPERLY AUTHENTICATED NOR DOES IT ACCURATELY REFLECT THE MISSING PORTION. MAY APPELLANT’S PUNITIVE DISCHARGE BE AFFIRMED DESPITE THE LACK OF A VERBATIM RECORD?
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
73 M.J. 200, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-short-armfor-2014.