United States v. Shikanda

460 F. App'x 199
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 23, 2011
DocketNo. 11-7085
StatusPublished

This text of 460 F. App'x 199 (United States v. Shikanda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Shikanda, 460 F. App'x 199 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Parameña J. Shikanda appeals the district court’s order denying his self-styled motion for sentence adjustment and has filed a motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Shikanda’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Shikanda, No. 2:09—cr-00251-3 (S.D.W.Va. July 11, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
460 F. App'x 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-shikanda-ca4-2011.