United States v. Shields

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Shields

667 F. App'x 57

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 28, 2016·No. No. 16-6126·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Darryl Thomas Shields appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying Shields’ Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion to correct a purported error in his presentence report. We have reviewed the record and discern no error in this ruling. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Shields, Nos. 1:05-cr-00254-TDS-1; 1:14-cv-00552-TDS-JEP (M.D.N.C. Dec. 15, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Darryl Thomas Shields appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying Shields’ Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion to correct a purported error in his presentence report. We have reviewed the record and discern no error in this ruling. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Shields, Nos. 1:05-cr-00254-TDS-1; 1:14-cv-00552-TDS-JEP (M.D.N.C. Dec. 15, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Shields, 667 F. App'x 57 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

667 F. App'x 57 (United States v. Shields) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.