United States v. Sherley A. Sanders

Eighth Circuit

United States v. Sherley A. Sanders

924 F.2d 800, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 1572, 1991 WL 11042

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 5, 1991

Docket90-1726

StatusPublished

This text of 924 F.2d 800 (United States v. Sherley A. Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Sherley A. Sanders, 924 F.2d 800, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 1572, 1991 WL 11042 (8th Cir. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sherley A. Sanders appeals from the sentence imposed upon her after revocation of her probation. She was sentenced to a term of three years imprisonment, and the sentence was entered following an earlier promise of the district court that on any revocation of-probation she would be “gone for three years.” The district court did not apply the Sentencing Guidelines.

This court has recently held in United States v. Von Washington, 915 F.2d 390, 392 (8th Cir.1990) that when probation is revoked, the defendant must be sentenced in accord with the Guidelines, as required by 18 U.S.C. §§ 3553(b) and 3565(a) (1988). See also United States v. Smith, 907 F.2d 133 (11th Cir.1990).

Accordingly, we remand to the district court for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Sherley A. Sanders appeals from the sentence imposed upon her after revocation of her probation. She was sentenced to a term of three years imprisonment, and the sentence was entered following an earlier promise of the district court that on any revocation of-probation she would be “gone for three years.” The district court did not apply the Sentencing Guidelines.

This court has recently held in United States v. Von Washington, 915 F.2d 390, 392 (8th Cir.1990) that when probation is revoked, the defendant must be sentenced in accord with the Guidelines, as required by 18 U.S.C. §§ 3553(b) and 3565(a) (1988). See also United States v. Smith, 907 F.2d 133 (11th Cir.1990).

Accordingly, we remand to the district court for resentencing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

924 F.2d 800, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 1572, 1991 WL 11042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sherley-a-sanders-ca8-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack