United States v. Sheriffs

397 F. App'x 395
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 29, 2010·No. No. 08-10403·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

James Douglas Sheriffs appeals from the district court’s order revoking his supervised release and imposing a six-month sentence. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Sheriffs’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Sheriffs has filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Sheriffs, 397 F. App'x 395 (9th Cir. 2010).

397 F. App'x 395 (United States v. Sheriffs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)