United States v. Sheppard
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Pursuant to his plea appellant was convicted of wrongful possession of hashish and a false pass, both in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 934. There were errors in the trial judge’s inquiry which call the providence of his plea into question. United States v. King, 3 M.J. 458 (C.M.A. 1977); United States v. Green, 24 U.S.C.M.A. 299, 52 C.M.R. 10, 1 M.J. 453 (1976); United States v. Harden, 24 U.S.C.M.A. 76, 51 C.M.R. 249, 1 M.J. 258 (1976).
There was also error in the computation of the maximum sentence, both by the trial judge and staff judge advocate. Because the offense of possession of 480 grams of hashish was committed during November 1976, the maximum confinement portion of the punishment for that offense was two years. United States v. Jackson, 3 M.J. 101 (C.M.A.1977); United States v. Courtney, 51 C.M.R. 796, 1 M.J. 438 (C.M.A.1976).
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
4 M.J. 659 (United States v. Sheppard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.