United States v. Shellie Lee Langmade

236 F.3d 931, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 150, 2001 WL 27576
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 8, 2001
Docket00-2019
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 236 F.3d 931 (United States v. Shellie Lee Langmade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Shellie Lee Langmade, 236 F.3d 931, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 150, 2001 WL 27576 (8th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Shellie Lee Langmade pleaded guilty to conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine. The presentence report (PSR) assigned Langmade three criminal history points under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.1 resulting in a criminal history category of II, but the district court departed downward under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3 to a criminal history category of I, finding category IT overstated the seriousness of Langmade’s past criminal conduct. Although Langmade’s sentencing range was then 70-87 months, the amount of drugs involved triggered a statutory mandatory minimum sentence of ten years imprisonment. At sentencing, Langmade argued she was eligible for relief under the “safety valve,” U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2, which requires a district court to sentence a defendant within the applicable guidelines range regardless of any statutory minimum sentence if, among other things, the defendant does not have more than one criminal history point “as determined under the sentencing guidelines.” U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(1). The district court *932 decided that given its downward departure to criminal history category I under § 4A1.3, it could apply the safety valve in § 5C1.2. The Government appeals. T he district court’s reduction of Langmade’s criminal history category under § 4A1.3 does not delete criminal history points for the purposes of the safety valve. See United States v. Webb, 218 F.3d 877, 881 (8th Cir.2000). Because Langmade was properly charged with three criminal history points under § 4A1.1, she does not qualify for the safety valve reduction under § 5C1.2. See id. at 882. We thus reverse and remand for resentencing consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Showin Keon Davis v. United States
858 F.3d 529 (Eighth Circuit, 2017)
United States v. O. Monzalvez-Salinas
170 F. App'x 999 (Eighth Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Vanessa Cabrera
167 F. App'x 578 (Eighth Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Terrence O. Watson
44 F. App'x 67 (Eighth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Matthew M. Stone
39 F. App'x 478 (Eighth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Gary Dewitt Miller
32 F. App'x 176 (Eighth Circuit, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
236 F.3d 931, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 150, 2001 WL 27576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-shellie-lee-langmade-ca8-2001.