United States v. Sheldon I. Matzkin

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Sheldon I. Matzkin

52 F.3d 322, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17607, 1995 WL 215423

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 12, 1995

Docket94-6369

StatusPublished

This text of 52 F.3d 322 (United States v. Sheldon I. Matzkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Sheldon I. Matzkin, 52 F.3d 322, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17607, 1995 WL 215423 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

52 F.3d 322
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Sheldon I. MATZKIN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-6369.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 28, 1995.
Decided: April 12, 1995.

John DeWitt Cline, Williams & Connolly, Washington, DC, for Appellant. Joseph John Aronica, Assistant United States Attorney, Jack I. Hanley, Office of The United States Attorney, Alexandria, VA, for Appellee.

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Matzkin, Nos. CR-92-437-A, CA-94-206-AM (E.D. Va. Mar. 22, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We deny Appellant's motion for release pending appeal

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

52 F.3d 322
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Sheldon I. MATZKIN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-6369.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 28, 1995.
Decided: April 12, 1995.

John DeWitt Cline, Williams & Connolly, Washington, DC, for Appellant. Joseph John Aronica, Assistant United States Attorney, Jack I. Hanley, Office of The United States Attorney, Alexandria, VA, for Appellee.

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Matzkin, Nos. CR-92-437-A, CA-94-206-AM (E.D. Va. Mar. 22, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We deny Appellant's motion for release pending appeal

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 F.3d 322, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17607, 1995 WL 215423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sheldon-i-matzkin-ca4-1995.