United States v. Shelby Baccus

84 F. App'x 723
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 6, 2004
Docket03-2041
StatusUnpublished

This text of 84 F. App'x 723 (United States v. Shelby Baccus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Shelby Baccus, 84 F. App'x 723 (8th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Shelby Baccus appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed following revocation of his supervised release. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that Baccus’s revocation sentence does not exceed the maximum prison term authorized by statute, is within the range recommended by the Sentencing Guidelines policy statements, and does not reflect an abuse of discretion. See United States v. *724 Grimes, 54 F.3d 489, 492 (8th Cir.1995) (standard of review).

The judgment is affirmed. We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. James Grimes
54 F.3d 489 (Eighth Circuit, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 F. App'x 723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-shelby-baccus-ca8-2004.