United States v. Sheila M. Dickerson

105 F.3d 660
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedJanuary 27, 1997
Docket96-3111
StatusUnpublished

This text of 105 F.3d 660 (United States v. Sheila M. Dickerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Sheila M. Dickerson, 105 F.3d 660 (7th Cir. 1997).

Opinion

105 F.3d 660

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpublished orders shall not be cited or used as precedent except to support a claim of res judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case in any federal court within the circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Sheila M. DICKERSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-3111.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 19, 1996.
Decided Dec. 19, 1996.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 27, 1997.

Before BAUER, FLAUM, RIPPLE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Sheila Dickerson pleaded guilty to and was convicted of one count of distributing a controlled substance (crack) in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). After she was sentenced to seventy months imprisonment, five years supervised release, $2,070.00 in restitution, and the mandatory $50 special assessment, Dickerson appealed. Her appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Pursuant to Circuit Rule 51(a), Dickerson was notified of the filing of the Anders brief and given an opportunity to respond. She has not done so. We will grant the motion to withdraw if the possible issues for appeal are "groundless in light of legal principles and decisions." United States v. Eggen, 984 F.2d 848, 850 (7th Cir.1993) (citing McCoy v. Court of Appeals, 486 U.S. 429, 436 (1988)).

In Dickerson's plea agreement, she specifically waived her right to appeal as long as her sentence fell into the range specified by offense level 27 and criminal history category I, which is between seventy and eighty-seven months imprisonment. She received seventy months imprisonment. We have reviewed the transcript of the change of plea hearing and find no basis upon which Dickerson may seek to withdraw her guilty plea, nor has she requested to do so. A competent defendant has the right to waive her constitutional rights, including the right to appeal. United States v. Wenger, 58 F.3d 280, 282-83 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 349 (1995); see also United States v. Ogden, No. 96-2754, slip op. at 4 (7th Cir. Dec. 16, 1996). After being properly advised by the court Dickerson expressly waived that right, and consequently the motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the appeal is DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1
486 U.S. 429 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Dale R. Eggen
984 F.2d 848 (Seventh Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Dennis L. Wenger
58 F.3d 280 (Seventh Circuit, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 F.3d 660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sheila-m-dickerson-ca7-1997.