United States v. Sheard

Third Circuit

United States v. Sheard

64 F. App'x 843

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedApril 4, 2003

DocketNo. 02-2149

StatusPublished

This text of 64 F. App'x 843 (United States v. Sheard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Sheard, 64 F. App'x 843 (3d Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

McKEE, Circuit Judge.

Bryant Sheard appeals from the judgment of sentence that was entered following the district court’s acceptance of Sheard’s guilty plea pursuant to a written plea agreement. Defense counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) in which counsel avers that, “after a conscientious examination of the record, [844]*844[he] could find no non-frivolous issues for appeal.” Appellant’s Br. at 17. Accordingly, we will affirm the judgment of sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

McKEE, Circuit Judge.

Bryant Sheard appeals from the judgment of sentence that was entered following the district court’s acceptance of Sheard’s guilty plea pursuant to a written plea agreement. Defense counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) in which counsel avers that, “after a conscientious examination of the record, [844]*844[he] could find no non-frivolous issues for appeal.” Appellant’s Br. at 17. Accordingly, we will affirm the judgment of sentence.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 F. App'x 843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sheard-ca3-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack