United States v. Shawn Baldwin
This text of United States v. Shawn Baldwin (United States v. Shawn Baldwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 23-3238
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
SHAWN BALDWIN, Appellant
(D.N.J. No. 2:18-cr-00580-001)
SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING
Present: CHAGARES, Chief Judge, and HARDIMAN, RESTREPO, BIBAS, PORTER, MATEY, PHIPPS, FREEMAN, MONTGOMERY-REEVES, CHUNG, and ROTH ∗, Circuit Judges
The petition for rehearing filed by Appellant in the above-entitled case having
been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court, it is hereby
ORDERED that the petition for rehearing by the panel is GRANTED. The Clerk is
∗ Judge Roth’s vote is limited to panel rehearing only. directed to file the amended opinion contemporaneously with this order. As the revisions
do not affect the disposition of the appeal, the judgment will remain as filed.
A majority of the judges of the circuit in regular service not having voted for rehearing,
the petition for rehearing by the Court en banc is DENIED.
BY THE COURT,
s/ Stephanos Bibas Circuit Judge
Date: February 13, 2025 CLW/cc: Mark E. Coyne, Esq. Norman Gross, Esq. Laura K. Gasiorowski, Esq.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Shawn Baldwin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-shawn-baldwin-ca3-2025.