United States v. Sharon Toman

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 11, 2008
Docket06-2313
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Sharon Toman (United States v. Sharon Toman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Sharon Toman, (8th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________

Nos. 06-2313/2835 ___________

United States of America, * * Appellant, * * Appeals from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Missouri. Sharon Toman, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * * ------------------------------------- * * United States of America, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Sharon Toman, * * Appellee. * ___________

Submitted: December 27, 2007 Filed: January 11, 2008 ___________

Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM. In these consolidated appeals, the government appeals the district court’s order granting Sharon Toman’s motion to expunge her convictions, one of which was previously set aside under the Federal Youth Corrections Act (FYCA), 18 U.S.C. § 5010(a) (repealed 1984), and the order denying the government’s motion to reconsider. We find that the district court did not have jurisdiction to expunge either of Toman’s convictions, see United States v. Meyer, 439 F.3d 855, 859-60 (8th Cir. 2006) (district court does not have ancillary jurisdiction to expunge conviction based solely on equitable considerations); Bear Robe v. Parker, 270 F.3d 1192, 1195 (8th Cir. 2001) (set-aside provision of FYCA is not equivalent to expungement of record); United States v. McMains, 540 F.2d 387, 389 (8th Cir. 1976) (FYCA does not authorize expungement of record), and thus we reverse and remand to the district court with instructions to vacate the expungement order. We also deny Toman’s motion to dismiss the appeal. ______________________________

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Duane Thomas McMains
540 F.2d 387 (Eighth Circuit, 1976)
United States v. Michael Meyer
439 F.3d 855 (Eighth Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Sharon Toman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sharon-toman-ca8-2008.