United States v. Sharon Mack

74 F.3d 1234, 1996 WL 15456
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 17, 1996
Docket95-7188
StatusPublished

This text of 74 F.3d 1234 (United States v. Sharon Mack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Sharon Mack, 74 F.3d 1234, 1996 WL 15456 (4th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

74 F.3d 1234
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Sharon MACK, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-7188.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 14, 1995.
Decided: January 17, 1996.

Sharon Mack, Appellant Pro Se. William Corley Lucius, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, SC, for Appellee.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying her 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny Appellant's motions for counsel and preparation of a transcript, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Mack, No. CR-92-147; CA-95-1909-6-20 (D.S.C. July 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 F.3d 1234, 1996 WL 15456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sharon-mack-ca4-1996.