United States v. Shane Skillings

83 F.3d 417, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 23703, 1996 WL 223576
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 3, 1996·No. 96-6132·Unpublished

Opinion

83 F.3d 417

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Shane SKILLINGS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-6132.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 15, 1996.
Decided May 3, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-91-140)

Shane Skillings, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Skillings, No. CR-91-140 (E.D.Va. Dec. 29, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Shane Skillings, 83 F.3d 417, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 23703, 1996 WL 223576 (4th Cir. 1996).

83 F.3d 417 (United States v. Shane Skillings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related