United States v. Shackelford

Sixth Circuit

United States v. Shackelford

84 F.2d 1018, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4813

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 11, 1936

DocketNo. 6890

StatusPublished

This text of 84 F.2d 1018 (United States v. Shackelford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Shackelford, 84 F.2d 1018, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4813 (6th Cir. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The court being of opinion that there was no substantial evidence to support the finding of the trial court that appellee’s intestate, Malcomb E. Shackelford, became permanently and totally disabled during the life of the insurance policy sued upon, it is ordered .and adjudged that the judgment be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. U. S. v. Gwin (C.C.A.) 68 F.(2d) 124; U. S. v. Sumner (C.C.A.) 69 F.(2d) 770; U. S. v. Middleton (C.C.A.) 81 F.(2d) 205, decided January 17, 1936.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The court being of opinion that there was no substantial evidence to support the finding of the trial court that appellee’s intestate, Malcomb E. Shackelford, became permanently and totally disabled during the life of the insurance policy sued upon, it is ordered .and adjudged that the judgment be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. U. S. v. Gwin (C.C.A.) 68 F.(2d) 124; U. S. v. Sumner (C.C.A.) 69 F.(2d) 770; U. S. v. Middleton (C.C.A.) 81 F.(2d) 205, decided January 17, 1936.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 F.2d 1018, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-shackelford-ca6-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack