United States v. Shackelford

Sixth Circuit

United States v. Shackelford

84 F.2d 1018, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4813

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 11, 1936·No. No. 6890·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The court being of opinion that there was no substantial evidence to support the finding of the trial court that appellee’s intestate, Malcomb E. Shackelford, became permanently and totally disabled during the life of the insurance policy sued upon, it is ordered .and adjudged that the judgment be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. U. S. v. Gwin (C.C.A.) 68 F.(2d) 124; U. S. v. Sumner (C.C.A.) 69 F.(2d) 770; U. S. v. Middleton (C.C.A.) 81 F.(2d) 205, decided January 17, 1936.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The court being of opinion that there was no substantial evidence to support the finding of the trial court that appellee’s intestate, Malcomb E. Shackelford, became permanently and totally disabled during the life of the insurance policy sued upon, it is ordered .and adjudged that the judgment be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. U. S. v. Gwin (C.C.A.) 68 F.(2d) 124; U. S. v. Sumner (C.C.A.) 69 F.(2d) 770; U. S. v. Middleton (C.C.A.) 81 F.(2d) 205, decided January 17, 1936.

United States v. Shackelford, 84 F.2d 1018, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4813 (6th Cir. 1936).

Pincite

84 F.2d 1018 (United States v. Shackelford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related