United States v. Shabazz

35 F. App'x 563
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 21, 2002·No. No. 01-50205; D.C. No. CR-00-00298-FMC-06·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Hasan Shabazz appeals the demal of his motion to suppress evidence seized at Ms [564] residence pursuant to a search warrant. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. The issuance of a search warrant by a judge is reviewed for clear error. United, States v. Bowman, 215 F.3d 951, 963 n. 6 (9th Cir.2000). There was no clear error here. The search warrant was supported by probable cause.

Because the affidavit of special agent Robert Williams was sufficient to establish a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime would be found at the location specified in the search warrant, the motion to suppress was properly denied. See United States v. Gil, 58 F.3d 1414, 1419 (9th Cir.1995) (internal quotations omitted).

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Shabazz, 35 F. App'x 563 (9th Cir. 2002).

35 F. App'x 563 (United States v. Shabazz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shabazz v. United States
537 U.S. 893 (Supreme Court, 2002)