United States v. Seymour Sweigman

Third Circuit

United States v. Seymour Sweigman

287 F.2d 25, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 5328

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedFebruary 14, 1961

Docket13199

StatusPublished

This text of 287 F.2d 25 (United States v. Seymour Sweigman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Seymour Sweigman, 287 F.2d 25, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 5328 (3d Cir. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction brought against the defendant for (1) embezzlement of funds from a bank which was a member of the Federal Reserve System and insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and (2) making a false entry. The sections alleged to be violated are 656 and 1005, 18 U.S.C. The jury, upon consideration of all the evidence, returned a verdict of guilty. The defendant contends there was not sufficient evidence to take the case to. the jury. This point was made with great earnestness and we have treated it with similar earnestness.

The conclusion of the Court is that the evidence was sufficient to carry the case to the jury and the judgment must, therefore, be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction brought against the defendant for (1) embezzlement of funds from a bank which was a member of the Federal Reserve System and insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and (2) making a false entry. The sections alleged to be violated are 656 and 1005, 18 U.S.C. The jury, upon consideration of all the evidence, returned a verdict of guilty. The defendant contends there was not sufficient evidence to take the case to. the jury. This point was made with great earnestness and we have treated it with similar earnestness.

The conclusion of the Court is that the evidence was sufficient to carry the case to the jury and the judgment must, therefore, be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

287 F.2d 25, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 5328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-seymour-sweigman-ca3-1961.