United States v. Settimo Accardo (Accardi)

208 F.2d 632
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided December 7, 1953·No. 11138_1·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment which canceled the appellant’s certificate of naturalization. He complains that the court was in error in finding that he committed fraud, that his certificate was illegally procured, and that in any event the matter was res judicata between him and the Government. We have the advantage of a very full and thoroughly considered opinion in this matter by Judge Hartshorne, of the District Court for the District of New Jersey. It is reported in 113 F.Supp. 783. This opinion sets out the facts fully and discusses the legal propositions involved.

We agree with the conclusions reached by the district judge and think it would be a waste of words to add anything to his discussion.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Settimo Accardo (Accardi), 208 F.2d 632 (3d Cir. 1953).

208 F.2d 632 (United States v. Settimo Accardo (Accardi)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alsco-Harvard Fraud Litigation Consolidated Cases
523 F. Supp. 790 (District of Columbia, 1981)
United States v. Osidach
513 F. Supp. 51 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1981)
United States v. Walus
453 F. Supp. 699 (N.D. Illinois, 1978)
In Re Petition for Naturalization of Sotos
221 F. Supp. 145 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1963)
Chaunt v. United States
364 U.S. 350 (Supreme Court, 1960)
United States v. Paul De Lucia
256 F.2d 487 (Seventh Circuit, 1958)
United States v. De Lucia
163 F. Supp. 36 (N.D. Illinois, 1957)
United States v. Kessler
213 F.2d 53 (Third Circuit, 1954)