United States v. Serrano-Sanchez

206 F.3d 1300, 2000 WL 298667
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 20, 2000
DocketNo. 00-1629
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 206 F.3d 1300 (United States v. Serrano-Sanchez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Serrano-Sanchez, 206 F.3d 1300, 2000 WL 298667 (8th Cir. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant is hereby granted leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. The Clerk is directed to appoint counsel to represent him.

The procedure in which a district court certifies that an appeal is not taken in good faith, and denies leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, should be limited to civil cases. In direct criminal appeals, district courts should process a notice of appeal in the ordinary fashion. If counsel believes that the appeal is frivolous, the Anders-Penson procedure should be followed.1 The Court of Appeals will then determine the course of the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
206 F.3d 1300, 2000 WL 298667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-serrano-sanchez-ca8-2000.