United States v. Serrano

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Serrano

353 F. App'x 422

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided December 1, 2009·No. No. 09-11722·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Monique A. Brochu, appointed counsel for Rosa Serrano, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, because, in her opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Serrano’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Monique A. Brochu, appointed counsel for Rosa Serrano, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, because, in her opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Serrano’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Serrano, 353 F. App'x 422 (11th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

353 F. App'x 422 (United States v. Serrano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related