United States v. Serna
This text of 47 F. App'x 817 (United States v. Serna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Albert Serna contends that the government breached his plea agreement by failing to recommend a substantial assistance departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1. Serna failed to raise this issue below, however, and therefore waived it. See United States v. Belden, 957 F.2d 671, 674-75 (9th Cir.1992); United States v. Flores-Payon, 942 F.2d 556, 558 (9th Cir.1991).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
47 F. App'x 817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-serna-ca9-2002.