United States v. Sergio Ortiz-Lucatero

653 F. App'x 863
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 24, 2016
Docket15-50127
StatusUnpublished

This text of 653 F. App'x 863 (United States v. Sergio Ortiz-Lucatero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Sergio Ortiz-Lucatero, 653 F. App'x 863 (9th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER *

The Joint Motion to Summarily Reverse and Remand is GRANTED. We remand for resentencing on a closed record as to the conviction under California Health and Safety Code § 11352(a), but otherwise on an open record. See United States v. Espinoza-Morales, 621 F.3d 1141, 1152 (9th Cir. 2010) (remanding on closed record where government failed to show that pri- or convictions qualified as crimes of violence and did not identify any additional materials it could offer at resentencing); United States v. Matthews, 278 F.3d 880, 885-90 (9th Cir. 2002) (en banc).

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Espinoza-Morales
621 F.3d 1141 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
United States v. James Earl Matthews
278 F.3d 880 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
653 F. App'x 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sergio-ortiz-lucatero-ca9-2016.