United States v. Serafini
This text of 135 F.3d 767 (United States v. Serafini) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
135 F.3d 767
45 ERC 2107
U.S.
v.
Louis Serafini, Alfred Bernabei, Ernest Buttafoco, Michael
J. Naples, Jr., Empire Contracting Co., City of Scranton,
PA, American Can Co., Chamberlain Mfg. Corp., Litton Ind.
Inc., Litton Systems, Inc., Litton Business Systems, Inc.,
RCA Corp., Technographics, Inc., Technographics Fitchburg
Coated Products, Inc., John C. Baumann, Dora Bridy, Cecilia
E. Rinaldi, Dora Bridy, Personal Rep of Estate of Edward
Bridy, O.S.C. Company, Andrew Evanish,
NO. 96-7081
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
Dec 01, 1997
Appeal From: M.D.Pa. ,No.86cv01591 ,
898 F.Supp. 287
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
135 F.3d 767, 1997 WL 809475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-serafini-ca3-1997.