United States v. Sellers

73 F. App'x 598
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Sellers. Read the opinion of the Court — 62 F. App'x 499
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 25, 2003·No. 03-6230·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pernell Jeffrey Sellers was convicted of: Count 2, conspiracy to distribute cocaine, 18 U.S.C. § 846 (2000); Count 3, killing or causing a killing in furtherance of a continuing criminal enterprise, 21 U.S.C. § 848(e) (2000); Count 4, interstate travel in aid of racketeering, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1952, 2 (2000); and Count 5, using and carrying a firearm during a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c), 2 (2000). This court affirmed the convictions on appeal. See United States v. Sellers, No. CR-97-20 (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 17, 2000) (unpublished).

Thereafter, Sellers filed a motion for new trial based upon Denise Grantham’s recantation of her trial testimony. Sellers alleged that this “newly discovered” evidence provided him a basis for a new trial regarding his convictions for Counts 3, 4 and 5. After holding a hearing, the district court denied the motion relying on United States v. Wallace, 528 F.2d 863 (4th Cir.1976). We have reviewed the record and arguments on appeal, and do not find that the district court abused its discretion in denying the motion. See United States v. Roberts, 262 F.3d 286, 293 (4th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 991, 122 S.Ct. 1548, 152 L.Ed.2d 473 (2002). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Sellers, 73 F. App'x 598 (4th Cir. 2003).

73 F. App'x 598 (United States v. Sellers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Keith Leon Wallace
528 F.2d 863 (Fourth Circuit, 1976)
United States v. Roberts
262 F.3d 286 (Fourth Circuit, 2001)