United States v. Seitles

S.D. New York

United States v. Seitles

742 F. Supp. 1275, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20134, 1990 WL 129217

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Seitles. Read the opinion of the Court — 106 B.R. 36 →

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided August 22, 1990·No. 88 Civ. 0224 (SWK)·Published

Opinion

ORDER

KRAM, District Judge.

Upon the joint motion of the parties to this action for an order pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, vacating an order of this Court entered on September 11, 1989, as a condition of the parties’ settlement of this action, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Order of this Court, entered in this action on September 11, 1989, 106 B.R. 36, is hereby vacated.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

KRAM, District Judge.

Upon the joint motion of the parties to this action for an order pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, vacating an order of this Court entered on September 11, 1989, as a condition of the parties’ settlement of this action, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Order of this Court, entered in this action on September 11, 1989, 106 B.R. 36, is hereby vacated.

SO ORDERED.

United States v. Seitles, 742 F. Supp. 1275, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20134, 1990 WL 129217 (S.D.N.Y. 1990).

Pincite

742 F. Supp. 1275 (United States v. Seitles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related