United States v. Segelman

Third Circuit

United States v. Segelman

212 F.2d 88, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3336

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided April 8, 1954·No. 11252·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The provisions of Section 2255, Title 28, United States Code, may not be employed as the appellant, Segelman, seeks to make use of them, in order to correct alleged errors committed by the court below during Segelman’s trial. The sentences imposed upon Segelman were not imposed in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States and the court had jurisdiction to impose the sentences. Segelman appealed from the judgments against him, D.C., 86 F.Supp. 114, but his appeal was dismissed by this court for want of prosecution. No question cognizable under Section 2255 was before the court below. 117 F.Supp. 507. Accordingly, the judgment appealed from will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The provisions of Section 2255, Title 28, United States Code, may not be employed as the appellant, Segelman, seeks to make use of them, in order to correct alleged errors committed by the court below during Segelman’s trial. The sentences imposed upon Segelman were not imposed in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States and the court had jurisdiction to impose the sentences. Segelman appealed from the judgments against him, D.C., 86 F.Supp. 114, but his appeal was dismissed by this court for want of prosecution. No question cognizable under Section 2255 was before the court below. 117 F.Supp. 507. Accordingly, the judgment appealed from will be affirmed.

United States v. Segelman, 212 F.2d 88, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3336 (3d Cir. 1954).

Pincite

212 F.2d 88 (United States v. Segelman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related