United States v. Seeley

467 F.2d 571
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 2, 1972
DocketNos. 72-1773, 72-1774
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 467 F.2d 571 (United States v. Seeley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Seeley, 467 F.2d 571 (5th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

A jury found Eugene Peter Linale guilty on thirteen counts of violating the laws of the United States with reference to firearms, plus an additional count charging a conspiracy to do so. Frank Eugene Seeley was also convicted on a number of counts, charging similar offenses. Mrs. Phyllis Jean Linale was convicted of conspiracy.

The appeal seeks reversal predicated on the following grounds: (1) insufficiency of the evidence, (2) entrapment, (3) failure to suppress evidence obtained by an assertedly illegal search, (4) failure to grant a severance, (5) judicial non-compliance with Rule 25 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and (6) improper prosecutorial oral argument.

Finding no effective merit in any of these contentions, the judgments of convictions are, as to all three appellants,

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
467 F.2d 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-seeley-ca5-1972.