United States v. Seaton

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-31287 Summary Calendar __________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

H. DONOVAN SEATON, et al.,

Defendants,

H. DONOVAN SEATON,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 95-CV-1254 G - - - - - - - - - - May 17, 1996

Before SMITH, BENDAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant H. Donovan Seaton appeals the denial of his 28

U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence, arguing that he

received ineffective assistance of counsel, that the court made

several errors in sentencing him, and that the prosecution

obtained his guilty plea through outrageous conduct and coercion.

Seaton raises his substantive ineffective-assistance claims and

an assertion that an enhancement to his base offense level

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-31287 -2-

violated the Ex Post Facto Clause for the first time on appeal.

Seaton has not shown plain error as to these claims. See

Robertson v. Plano City of Texas, 70 F.3d 21, 23 (5th Cir. 1995).

As to Seaton’s other claims, this court AFFIRMS essentially for

the reasons cited by the magistrate judge and district court.

United States v. Seaton, No. 91-364-”G” (E.D. La. Oct. 13, 1995).

AFFIRMED.