United States v. Sears

9 Cust. Ct. 539, 1942 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1326
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJuly 24, 1942
DocketNo. 5688; Entry No. 5469
StatusPublished

This text of 9 Cust. Ct. 539 (United States v. Sears) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Sears, 9 Cust. Ct. 539, 1942 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1326 (cusc 1942).

Opinion

Keefe, Judge:

This reappraisement filed by the collector involves the proper value for duty purposes of certain linen damask imported' from Belfast, Ireland.

At the trial of the case the examiner at the port of Los Angeles testified that when he examined the invoice he overlooked a statement thereon disclosing the selling price for the merchandise in the home-market upon the date of exportation and erroneously accepted the entered price as correct.

An examination of the invoice discloses two columns of prices. The first column represents the price at which the merchandise was sold and the second the “Current Selling Price at Date of Exportation.” The prices on the date of exportation are higher than the prices at which the merchandise was invoiced. It is apparent therefore that the foreign value upon the date of shipment is higher than the export value thereof and under the provisions of section 402 (a) ■such foreign value is to be accepted for duty purposes.

For the reasons stated I therefore find the foreign value upon the date of exportation to be the value of the merchandise as follows:

£
64" Linen Damask, Mill No. 608, Call No. 7553,23)4d per yard
70» « “ “ “■ “ “ 7554,25}4d “ “
16" x 16" Linen Damask
Napkins “ “ “ 7555,3/8)4 per dozen
18" x 18" “ “ “ “ “ “ 7556,4/6}i “ “
Less cash discount 3)4%
Plus cases.

Judgment will be entered in favor of the plaintiff accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Cust. Ct. 539, 1942 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sears-cusc-1942.