United States v. Sears

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Sears

158 F. App'x 197

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedNovember 29, 2005

DocketNos. 05-10922, 05-10923; D.C. Docket Nos. 03-60170-CR-WPD & 03-60194-CR-WPD

StatusPublished

This text of 158 F. App'x 197 (United States v. Sears) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Sears, 158 F. App'x 197 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Joel D. Robrish, counsel for Demetrius Sears in these direct criminal appeals, has [198]*198moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Sears’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Joel D. Robrish, counsel for Demetrius Sears in these direct criminal appeals, has [198]*198moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Sears’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

158 F. App'x 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sears-ca11-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack