United States v. Sears

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Sears

158 F. App'x 197

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided November 29, 2005·No. Nos. 05-10922, 05-10923; D.C. Docket Nos. 03-60170-CR-WPD & 03-60194-CR-WPD·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Joel D. Robrish, counsel for Demetrius Sears in these direct criminal appeals, has [198]*198moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Sears’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Joel D. Robrish, counsel for Demetrius Sears in these direct criminal appeals, has [198]*198moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Sears’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Sears, 158 F. App'x 197 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

158 F. App'x 197 (United States v. Sears) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related