United States v. Sean Carter

315 F.3d 651, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 3371, 2003 WL 118265
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 24, 2003·No. 01-5338·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

315 F.3d 651

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Sean CARTER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-5338.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

February 24, 2003.

Before MARTIN, Chief Judge; BOGGS, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, GILMAN, GIBBONS, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Pursuant to Sixth Cicuit I.O.P. 35(c), a majority of the Judges of the Court in regular active service have voted to grant the request of a member of the Court for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(a) provides as follows:

"The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal."

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

It is further ORDERED that the parties simultaneously file supplemental briefs not later than Monday, March 24, 2003.

The Clerk will schedule this case for oral argument as directed by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Sean Carter, 315 F.3d 651, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 3371, 2003 WL 118265 (6th Cir. 2003).

315 F.3d 651 (United States v. Sean Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Modrell v. Hayden
636 F. Supp. 2d 545 (W.D. Kentucky, 2009)
Murphy v. State
898 So. 2d 1031 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
United States v. Carter
Sixth Circuit, 2004
United States v. Sean Carter
378 F.3d 584 (Sixth Circuit, 2004)
United States v. Gould
326 F.3d 651 (Fifth Circuit, 2004)
United States v. Kelly Donald Gould
364 F.3d 578 (Fifth Circuit, 2004)