United States v. Sean Carter
This text of 315 F.3d 651 (United States v. Sean Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
315 F.3d 651
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Sean CARTER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-5338.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
February 24, 2003.
Before MARTIN, Chief Judge; BOGGS, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, GILMAN, GIBBONS, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Pursuant to Sixth Cicuit I.O.P. 35(c), a majority of the Judges of the Court in regular active service have voted to grant the request of a member of the Court for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(a) provides as follows:
"The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal."
Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
It is further ORDERED that the parties simultaneously file supplemental briefs not later than Monday, March 24, 2003.
The Clerk will schedule this case for oral argument as directed by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
315 F.3d 651, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 3371, 2003 WL 118265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sean-carter-ca6-2003.