United States v. Seabron Millender

451 F. App'x 462
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 30, 2011
Docket11-60035
StatusUnpublished

This text of 451 F. App'x 462 (United States v. Seabron Millender) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Seabron Millender, 451 F. App'x 462 (5th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Seabron Mackundra Millender, federal prisoner number # 15090-043, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance. No direct appeal was filed; however, the district court granted Millender’s pro se 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, in part, permitting an out-of-time direct appeal, based on defense counsel’s failure to file an appeal. The court additionally granted a certificate of appealability (COA) on the same ground but denied Millender leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP).

Millender now seeks a COA on additional issues, namely that (1) counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to argue the appropriate sentencing guidelines enhancements; (2) his conviction was obtained in violation of due process; (3) his conviction was obtained in violation of the Confrontation Clause; and (4) the Government breached his plea agreement. He also seeks leave to proceed IFP and requests a COA to appeal the issue that formed the basis of the district court’s orders granting both an out-of-time direct appeal and a COA.

Because the district court has granted an out-of-time direct appeal and reentered the original criminal judgment, Millender’s instant § 2255 appeal is DISMISSED. See Mack v. Smith, 659 F.2d 23, 25-26 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981). We express no opinion on the claims Millender has raised. See id. In light of the foregoing, Millender’s COA request is DENIED as unnecessary. His motion to proceed IFP is likewise DENIED.

*

Pursuant to 5tii Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
451 F. App'x 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-seabron-millender-ca5-2011.