United States v. Scranton

Third Circuit

United States v. Scranton

379 F.2d 556, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5498

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJuly 26, 1967

Docket16208

StatusPublished

This text of 379 F.2d 556 (United States v. Scranton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Scranton, 379 F.2d 556, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5498 (3d Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

379 F.2d 556

UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Joseph M. HOUGHTON, Appellant,
v.
William W. SCRANTON, Gov., Hon. Walter Alessandroni, Arthur T. Prasse, Com. State Corr., David N. Myers, Supt. State Corr. Institution, Graterford, Penna. and Clarence R. Wolfe, Dept. Supt. et al.

No. 16208.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Submitted June 19, 1967.

Decided July 26, 1967.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Harold K. Wood, Judge.

Joseph M. Houghton, pro se.

Thomas J. Mangan, Jr., Legal Asst., Frank P. Lawley, Jr., Deputy Atty. Gen., Harrisburg, Pa. (William C. Sennett, Atty. Gen., Harrisburg, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges, and VAN DUSEN, District Judge.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

On review of the record we find no error. The Order of the District Court of May 16, 1966 will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated by Judge Wood in his Memorandum Opinion. 272 F. Supp. 960 (E.D.Pa.1966).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI