United States v. Scott Wullschleger
This text of United States v. Scott Wullschleger (United States v. Scott Wullschleger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 96-3957 ___________
United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of South Dakota. Scott D. Wullschleger, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *
Submitted: May 23, 1997
Filed: June 20, 1997 ___________
Before, HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM.
Scott D. Wullschleger seeks to challenge the sentence imposed by the district 1 court after he pleaded guilty to mail fraud. Wullschleger agreed in his plea agreement, however, to waive his right to appeal his sentence. See United States v. His Law, 85 F.3d 379, 379 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (specifically enforcing plea agreement
1 The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota. promise not to appeal sentence). We will not consider Wullschleger's argument that he should not be bound by this promise because the government breached the plea agreement, as he failed to raise the alleged breach at sentencing. Cf. United States v. Cohen, 60 F.3d 460, 462 (8th Cir. 1995).
We therefore specifically enforce Wullschleger's promise against him by dismissing his appeal.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Scott Wullschleger, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-scott-wullschleger-ca8-1997.