United States v. Scott Edwards
This text of United States v. Scott Edwards (United States v. Scott Edwards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 24-3178 ___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Scott Douglas Edwards
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ___________________________
No. 24-3179 ___________________________
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________
Appeals from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central ____________ Submitted: April 8, 2025 Filed: April 11, 2025 [Unpublished] ____________
Before GRUENDER, KELLY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
In these consolidated cases, Scott Edwards appeals the sentences the district court1 imposed after revoking his concurrent terms of supervised release. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief challenging the substantive reasonableness of the sentences.
After careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion, as Edwards admitted to violating the conditions of his release, and the revocation sentences are within the statutory maximums. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 916 (8th Cir. 2009) (reviewing the substantive reasonableness of a revocation sentence for an abuse of discretion); United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 923 (8th Cir. 2006) (reciting the factors to discern whether a revocation sentence is unreasonable); see also 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (the maximum revocation prison term is two years if the underlying offense is a Class C felony); 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C) (setting a minimum--but no maximum--term of supervised release for certain controlled substance offenses).
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the judgment. ______________________________
1 The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Scott Edwards, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-scott-edwards-ca8-2025.