United States v. Scott

191 F. App'x 303
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Scott. Read the opinion of the Court — 112 F. App'x 965
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 24, 2006·No. 05-30914·Unpublished

Opinion

*304 PER CURIAM: *

Tammy M. Scott challenges the 60-month sentence that was imposed following her conviction for three charges of distribution of cocaine base. She argues that counsel rendered ineffective assistance and that the district court erred by failing to sua sponte recognize counsel’s deficiencies and to reduce her sentence accordingly.

We decline to review Scott’s ineffective assistance claim in this direct appeal. See United States v. Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 313-14 (5th Cir.1987). Scott’s argument concerning the district court’s purported failure to recognize counsel’s deficiencies is unpersuasive. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Scott, 191 F. App'x 303 (5th Cir. 2006).

191 F. App'x 303 (United States v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Tommy Ray Higdon
832 F.2d 312 (Fifth Circuit, 1987)