United States v. Scott
Opinion
Truman Scott appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion for Disclosure of Grand Jury Material.” We have reviewed the record and find no clear error in the district court’s denial. See Fed. R.Crim.P. 6(e)(3)(E)(ii); In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 800 F.2d 1293, 1298-99 (4th Cir.1986) (stating review standard). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
235 F. App'x 77 (United States v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.