United States v. Scott

235 F. App'x 77
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Scott. Read the opinion of the Court — 424 F.3d 431
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 28, 2007·No. 07-6220·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Truman Scott appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion for Disclosure of Grand Jury Material.” We have reviewed the record and find no clear error in the district court’s denial. See Fed. R.Crim.P. 6(e)(3)(E)(ii); In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 800 F.2d 1293, 1298-99 (4th Cir.1986) (stating review standard). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Scott, 235 F. App'x 77 (4th Cir. 2007).

235 F. App'x 77 (United States v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Grand Jury Proceedings, Gj-76-4 & Gj-75-3
800 F.2d 1293 (Fourth Circuit, 1986)