United States v. Schrum

638 F.2d 214
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided January 8, 1981·No. Nos. 80-1202 to 80-1206·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only issue in these consolidated appeals is whether Article IV(e) of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act, 18 U.S.C. App. § 2, requires dismissal of federal indictments in the following circumstances: State prisoners, against whom detainers had been lodged, were taken from state custody by federal authorities under a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum to appear for arraignment or other pretrial proceedings in federal court, but were not tried before being returned the same day to the state prison.

In a well-reasoned opinion the trial court held the federal indictments must be dismissed in these circumstances. We agree and affirm on the basis of the analysis set out in Judge Rogers’ opinion reported as United States v. Schrum, 504 F.Supp. 23 (D.Kan.1980).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Schrum, 638 F.2d 214 (10th Cir. 1981).

638 F.2d 214 (United States v. Schrum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Williams
896 A.2d 523 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)
Ex Parte Bozeman
781 So. 2d 165 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2000)
United States v. Daniels
First Circuit, 1993
Taylor v. United States
504 U.S. 991 (Supreme Court, 1992)
United States v. Larry Johnson
953 F.2d 1167 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
United States v. Iwuamadi
716 F. Supp. 420 (D. Nebraska, 1989)
United States v. Ronnie Trammel
813 F.2d 946 (Seventh Circuit, 1987)
Stephen Scott Crooker v. United States
814 F.2d 75 (First Circuit, 1987)
State v. Burrus
729 P.2d 935 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1986)