United States v. Schmitt
190 F. App'x 582
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Michael Christopher Schmitt appeals from the sentence imposed upon him following the revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
[583]*583We reject Schmitt’s contention that the supervised release statute violates the Sixth Amendment. See United States v. Huerta-Pimental, 445 F.3d 1220 (9th Cir. ^006).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Schmitt, 190 F. App'x 582 (9th Cir. 2006).
190 F. App'x 582 (United States v. Schmitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Lazaro Huerta-Pimental, AKA Jose Huerta
445 F.3d 1220 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)