United States v. Schell
71 M.J. 457
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedNovember 9, 2012
DocketNo. 13-5001/AR
StatusPublished
This text of 71 M.J. 457 (United States v. Schell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Schell, 71 M.J. 457 (Ark. 2012).
Opinion
CCA 20110264. Notice is hereby given that a certificate for review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals was filed under Rule 22 this date on the following issues:
I. WHETHER THE ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED WHEN, CONTRARY TO THE PLAIN LANGUAGE OF 18 U.S.C. § 2422(B), UNITED STATES v. BROOKS, 60 M.J. 495 (C.A.A.F. 2005), AND THE UNITED STATES COURTS OF APPEALS, THE SERVICE COURT HELD THAT “THE INTENT ELEMENT OF ATTEMPTED PERSUASION, INDUCEMENT, OR ENTICEMENT REQUIRES [THAT] THE ACCUSED. . . MUST INTEND THAT THE MINOR, ULTIMATELY, ACTUALLY ENGAGE IN ILLEGAL SEXUAL ACTIVITY AS A RESULT OF HIS PERSUASION, INDUCEMENT, OR ENTICEMENT.”
II. WHETHER THE ACCUSED’S UNSWORN STATEMENT DURING THE SENTENCING PHASE OF TRIAL WAS INCONSISTENT WITH HIS GUILTY PLEA.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Brooks
60 M.J. 495 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2005)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
71 M.J. 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-schell-armfor-2012.