United States v. Scat, Inc.

40 F. App'x 310
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJune 27, 2002
Docket01-3458
StatusUnpublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 40 F. App'x 310 (United States v. Scat, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Scat, Inc., 40 F. App'x 310 (8th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

*311 PER CURIAM.

Scat, Inc., pleaded guilty to making a false statement to an agent of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. The district court 1 sentenced the company to 5 years probation and ordered it to pay $545,161.20 in restitution. Scat challenges the restitution on appeal, arguing that it contravenes the holding of Hughey v. United States, 495 U.S. 411, 412-13, 110 S.Ct. 1979, 109 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990) (under Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982, restitution is limited to loss caused by conduct underlying count of conviction). This argument fails because Hughey was superseded by the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996, which authorizes restitution for every victim harmed in the course of the defendant’s scheme, conspiracy, or pattern of criminal activity, not just the offense of conviction. See United States v. Jackson, 155 F.3d 942, 949-50 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1059, 119 S.Ct. 627,142 L.Ed.2d 565 (1998).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

A true copy.

1

. The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Timothy Ritchie
858 F.3d 201 (Fourth Circuit, 2017)
United States v. August L. Holthaus, Jr.
486 F.3d 451 (Eighth Circuit, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 F. App'x 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-scat-inc-ca8-2002.