United States v. Scaringello
71 M.J. 108, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 88
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedJanuary 27, 2012
DocketNo. 12-0165/MC
StatusPublished
This text of 71 M.J. 108 (United States v. Scaringello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Scaringello, 71 M.J. 108, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 88 (Ark. 2012).
Opinion
CCA 201100192. Review granted on the following issue:
[109]*109WHETHER THE NMCCA MISAPPLIED THIS COURT’S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. FOSLER AND UNITED STATES v. WATKINS IN FINDING THAT, DESPITE FAILING TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE THE TERMINAL ELEMENT, THE ARTICLE 134 SPECIFICATION HERE STATES AN OFFENSE.
No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
71 M.J. 108, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-scaringello-armfor-2012.