United States v. Scambos
This text of United States v. Scambos (United States v. Scambos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-2102
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Petitioner - Appellee,
v.
THOMAS T. SCAMBOS, JR.,
Respondent - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (3:07-mc-00011-nkm-bwe)
Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 19, 2009
Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas T. Scambos, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Bruce R. Ellisen, Richard L. Parker, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Thomas T. Scambos, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
granting the Government’s motion to enforce an Internal Revenue
Service summons. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Scambos, No.
3:07-mc-00011-nkm-bwe (W.D. Va. Aug. 19, 2008). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Scambos, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-scambos-ca4-2009.