United States v. Saxton

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 1:20-CV-01278-ADA -SKO

12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO CLOSE THE CASE 14 ERNESTINA M. SAXTON, M.D., (Doc. 72) 15 Respondent. 16

17 18 On October 30, 2023, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with 19 prejudice. (Doc. 72). In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. 20 R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has 21 been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 22

23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: November 1, 2023 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28