United States v. Savva

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Savva

113 F. App'x 565

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 29, 2004·No. No. 04-6815·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Patricia Ann Sawa appeals the district court’s order denying her post-conviction motion for return of property under Fed. R.Crim.P. 41(g). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Savva, No. CR-02-280-2 (E.D.N.C. April 13, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Patricia Ann Sawa appeals the district court’s order denying her post-conviction motion for return of property under Fed. R.Crim.P. 41(g). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Savva, No. CR-02-280-2 (E.D.N.C. April 13, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Savva, 113 F. App'x 565 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

113 F. App'x 565 (United States v. Savva) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.