United States v. Savva
This text of United States v. Savva (United States v. Savva) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6815
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
PATRICIA ANN SAVVA,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-02-280-2)
Submitted: November 15, 2004 Decided: November 29, 2004
Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patricia Ann Savva, Appellant Pro Se. Peter W. Kellen, Special Agent, Frank DeArmon Whitney, United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Patricia Ann Savva appeals the district court’s order
denying her post-conviction motion for return of property under
Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See United States v. Savva, No. CR-02-280-2
(E.D.N.C. April 13, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Savva, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-savva-ca4-2004.