United States v. Saunders

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Saunders

55 F. App'x 694

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 12, 2003·No. No. 02-7619·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Troy R. Saunders appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel specific performance and granting the Government’s motion to withdraw a previously filed motion for sentence reduction under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Saunders, No. CR-97-344 (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 7, 2002 & entered Oct. 8, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Troy R. Saunders appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel specific performance and granting the Government’s motion to withdraw a previously filed motion for sentence reduction under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Saunders, No. CR-97-344 (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 7, 2002 & entered Oct. 8, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Saunders, 55 F. App'x 694 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

55 F. App'x 694 (United States v. Saunders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.