United States v. Saunders

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 19, 1999·No. 99-6258·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6258

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL VERTOIN SAUNDERS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CR- 96-204, CA-98-1493-DKC)

Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 19, 1999

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Vertoin Saunders, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland; Stuart A. Berman, As- sistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Michael Vertoin Saunders seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court. See United States v. Saunders, Nos.

CR-96-204; CA-98-1493-DKC (D. Md. Feb. 9, 1999). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Saunders, (4th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Saunders (United States v. Saunders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related