United States v. Saunders
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6258
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL VERTOIN SAUNDERS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CR- 96-204, CA-98-1493-DKC)
Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 19, 1999
Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Vertoin Saunders, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland; Stuart A. Berman, As- sistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Michael Vertoin Saunders seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994
& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-
soning of the district court. See United States v. Saunders, Nos.
CR-96-204; CA-98-1493-DKC (D. Md. Feb. 9, 1999). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Saunders (United States v. Saunders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.