United States v. Saul Vazquez-Morales

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 20, 2016
Docket15-40825
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Saul Vazquez-Morales (United States v. Saul Vazquez-Morales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Saul Vazquez-Morales, (5th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Case: 15-40825 Document: 00513471908 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2016

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40825 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED April 20, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SAUL VAZQUEZ-MORALES,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:15-CR-128-1

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Saul Vazquez-Morales raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 541, 562-63 & n.28 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), in which we held that the generic, contemporary definition of sexual abuse of a minor does not require the age of consent to be below 17 years old and does not include an age-differential requirement. He also raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 15-40825 Document: 00513471908 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2016

No. 15-40825

v. Elizondo-Hernandez, 755 F.3d 779, 781-82 (5th Cir. 2014), cert. denied, 135 S. Ct. 1011 (2015), which held that the Texas offense of indecency with a child by contact satisfied the generic definition of sexual abuse of a minor. Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Jorge Rodriguez
711 F.3d 541 (Fifth Circuit, 2013)
United States v. Alberto Elizondo-Hernandez
755 F.3d 779 (Fifth Circuit, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Saul Vazquez-Morales, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-saul-vazquez-morales-ca5-2016.